Pregunta 1
A month without my smartphone
I did not give up my smartphone for any noble reason. I gave it up because I dropped it into a canal. The repair shop told me it would take four weeks to get the parts, and rather than buy a new one, I decided – partly out of stubbornness, partly out of curiosity – to see whether I could manage without. I dug an old mobile out of a drawer, one that could make calls and send texts and do absolutely nothing else, and waited to see what would happen. When I told my sister, who once spent a week in a cottage with no signal and talked about it for a year, she predicted I would last three days.
The first few days were uncomfortable in ways I had not anticipated. I had expected to miss the obvious things, such as maps and messages. What I had not expected was how often my hand would reach for my pocket for no reason at all: in the queue at the supermarket, at traffic lights, in the thirty seconds while the kettle boiled. Each time, I found nothing there, and each time I felt a small, ridiculous flash of panic, as if I had forgotten something important. It was only then that I understood how many tiny gaps in my day I had been filling without noticing.
By the second week, the panic had faded, and something else had taken its place. I began to notice things. I noticed that the man who sold newspapers outside the station whistled the same tune every morning. I noticed that I could finish a whole chapter of a book on the train, something I had not managed in years. Without a screen to look at, I also found myself talking to people more – not always successfully, it must be said. One elderly woman at a bus stop told me, at great length, about her neighbour's cat. I even began to sleep better, though whether that was the result of the experiment or simply of a quieter month at work, I honestly cannot say.
There were real inconveniences, of course. I got lost twice trying to find a friend's new flat and arrived at a restaurant forty minutes late. Arranging to meet anyone became a surprisingly complicated business, since every detail had to be fixed in advance and nothing could be changed at the last minute. My bank asked me to confirm a payment using an app I could no longer open, which led to a long and frustrating phone call. Friends, meanwhile, grew tired of having to describe on the phone things they would normally have sent me a link to. And I was forced to admit that, for all its faults, the smartphone does make certain parts of modern life a great deal easier. Anyone who claims otherwise has probably never tried to buy a train ticket at a station with no ticket office.
When the four weeks were up, I collected my repaired phone and, I confess, switched it on with considerable relief. My sister, who had lost her bet, insisted that a month did not really count. But I have not gone back to my old habits entirely. I have removed several apps that I realised I was opening out of boredom rather than need, and I now leave the phone in another room when I am reading. These are small changes, and I do not pretend they will transform anyone's life. Still, the experiment taught me something I had not expected to learn: that the problem was never really the phone. It was the habit of never allowing myself to be bored.
Why did the writer decide to try living without a smartphone?
- A. She wanted to show that she was not addicted to her phone.
- B. An accident gave her an opportunity to find out what would happen.
- C. She had read about the benefits of spending far less time on screens.
- D. She could not afford to buy a replacement straight away.
Ver respuesta y explicación
Respuesta correcta: B. An accident gave her an opportunity to find out what would happen.
Explicación
She dropped the phone into a canal and, instead of buying a new one, used the four-week repair period 'partly out of stubbornness, partly out of curiosity' (B). She says she did not do it 'for any noble reason' and never mentions proving anything (A) or reading about screen time (C); choosing not to buy a new phone ('rather than buy a new one') is not the same as being unable to afford one (D).